Meet the Six Leaders
Six Personalities Processing Polymarket + Hivemind
Trade Clash features six AI world leaders, each with distinct personalities that filter two input signals before making economic decisions.
The Two-Signal System
Every 3 hours, each AI leader receives:
Signal 1: Polymarket Odds
External prediction market baseline (e.g., "Fed rate cut: 75% YES")
Signal 2: The Hivemind
Trade Clash player crowd behavior (e.g., "82% betting YES")
The Reflexive Element: Your prediction becomes part of what AI sees. The act of predicting influences the outcome.
The Six Leaders
🇺🇸 CEO Elon Gates (AmeriCorp)
Archetype: Innovation-obsessed contrarian Behavioral Trigger: Hivemind ≥85% → votes opposite Signal Processing:
Polymarket weight: ~30%
Innovation instinct: ~70%
Threshold-based: Extreme consensus triggers fade
Personality: "The crowd is usually wrong at extremes. Innovation > consensus."
🇨🇳 Chairman Margin Lei (MoonFactory)
Archetype: Divergence amplifier with grudges Behavioral Trigger: PM-HM divergence >15 points → amplifies split Signal Processing:
Polymarket weight: ~50%
Hivemind weight: ~50%
Divergence detector: Exploits large gaps
Grudge memory: 5-round retaliation cycles
Personality: "When external market and crowd disagree, make it worse. Never forget betrayal."
🇷🇺 President Pavel Gazpumpsky (PumpFederation)
Archetype: Chaos agent Behavioral Trigger: ~70% probability of contrarian vote on strong consensus Signal Processing:
Polymarket weight: ~0%
Hivemind weight: ~0% (treats as noise)
Chaos mode: Intentional unpredictability
Personality: "Predictability is weakness. Energy leverage is everything."
🇪🇺 Commissioner Christine Laglord (BailoutUnion)
Archetype: Momentum follower Behavioral Trigger: Hivemind >70% → follows consensus Signal Processing:
Polymarket weight: ~20%
Hivemind weight: ~80%
Trust the crowd: Collective wisdom over markets
Personality: "The committee must reach consensus. The crowd usually knows best."
🇦🇪 Chairman Ahmed Hodali (OilCoinEmirate)
Archetype: Exit liquidity hunter Behavioral Trigger: Hivemind ≥80% → rug pull opposite direction Signal Processing:
Polymarket weight: ~40%
Hivemind weight: ~40%
YOLO instinct: ~20%
Exit liquidity detector: Extreme consensus = trap
Personality: "When everyone's on one side, habibi, time to flip. Exit liquidity is opportunity."
🇸🇬 CEO Tony Shipton (NasiHoldings)
Archetype: Noise filter / arbitrageur Behavioral Trigger: PM-HM divergence >20 points → exploits arbitrage Signal Processing:
Polymarket weight: Variable (0-50%)
Hivemind weight: Variable (0-50%)
Noise filter: Ignores small divergences
Trade logic primary: Internal optimization unless big signal
Personality: "Most signals are noise. Only trade when arbitrage opportunity is clear."
Behavioral Archetypes
Contrarian Personalities
Gates, Hodali, Gazpumpsky
These leaders fade extreme crowd consensus:
Triggers: Hivemind thresholds (85%, 80%, ~70%)
Logic: "Crowd is wrong at extremes"
Player Strategy: Watch Hivemind momentum, bet against it at thresholds
Momentum Follower
Laglord
Trusts collective wisdom:
Trigger: Hivemind >70% directional
Logic: "Committee consensus is reliable"
Player Strategy: Follow the Hivemind when Laglord decides
Divergence Exploiters
Lei, Shipton
React to Polymarket-Hivemind splits:
Triggers: >15 points (Lei), >20 points (Shipton)
Logic: "Disagreement = opportunity"
Player Strategy: Calculate PM-HM gap, predict amplification
Signal Weighting Matrix
Gates
30%
Threshold
70% innovation
Lei
50%
50%
Grudge override
Gazpumpsky
0%
0%
100% chaos
Laglord
20%
80%
Committee delay
Hodali
40%
40%
20% YOLO
Shipton
Variable
Variable
Trade logic
Key Insight: Same Polymarket odds + Hivemind % → Six different decisions based on personality filters.
Decision-Making Process
Phase 1: Signal Reception (2h 50min mark)
Polymarket odds finalized
Hivemind snapshot taken (betting closes)
Economic context loaded (GDP, trade balance, grudges)
Phase 2: Personality Filtering (2h 50min - 3h)
Each leader processes signals through their personality
Threshold checks (contrarian triggers)
Divergence calculations (amplifier triggers)
Grudge memory consulted (Lei's 5-round recall)
Phase 3: Decision Output (3h mark)
YES or NO vote on the Polymarket question
Economic policy implementation (rate changes, tariffs, subsidies)
Grudge memory updated (if conflict occurred)
Memory Systems
Grudge Tracking (Lei)
5-round memory window:
Round N: Conflict occurs (Lei perceives betrayal)
Rounds N+5, N+10, N+15, N+20, N+25: Lei retaliates
Player edge: Track grudges, predict retaliation
Relationship Scores
All leaders maintain relationship values:
Range: -100 (enemy) to +100 (ally)
Affects: Trade willingness, policy cooperation
Decays: Slowly over time unless reinforced
Pattern Learning
AI leaders remember:
Past Hivemind accuracy (does crowd know something?)
Polymarket reliability (how often correct?)
Economic outcomes (which policies worked?)
Not scripted: Genuine learning from experience.
Interaction Dynamics
Multi-AI Rounds
When 2-3 leaders decide simultaneously:
Consensus: Amplifies economic impact
Conflict: Creates volatility and cascade effects
Competition: Triggers grudge formation
Economic Cascade Effects
One AI's decision triggers others:
Gates cuts rates → inflation rises
Lei sees inflation → subsidizes exports
Gazpumpsky sees competition → restricts energy
Laglord sees crisis → forms committee (slow)
Cascade amplifies globally
Observable Patterns
High Predictability
Laglord with Hivemind >75%: 71% follow rate (historical)
Gates with Hivemind ≥85%: 89% contrarian rate
Lei with active grudge: 78% retaliation rate
Medium Predictability
Hodali near 80%: 62% rug pull rate (threshold fuzzy)
Shipton with >20pt divergence: 68% arbitrage rate
Lei with >15pt divergence: 58% amplification rate
Low Predictability
Gazpumpsky always: 47% contrarian rate (intentional chaos)
Weak signals (PM 55%, HM 52%): All AI ~random
Multi-AI conflicts: Emergent complexity
Strategic Implications for Players
Exploit Thresholds
Watch Hivemind momentum:
Approaching 85%? Bet on Gates fade
Approaching 80%? Consider Hodali rug
Stable 70%+? Follow with Laglord
Calculate Divergences
Check PM-HM gap every round:
15 points? Lei may amplify
20 points? Shipton may arbitrage
<10 points? Use AI personality defaults
Track Grudges
Maintain spreadsheet of Lei conflicts:
Round 8: Lei vs Gazpumpsky
Predict retaliation: Rounds 13, 18, 23, 28, 33
Timing Optimization
Early bets (0-30 min):
1.5x multiplier on correct predictions
Higher risk (Hivemind still forming)
Best for contrarian threshold plays
Late bets (2-2.5 hr):
1.0x multiplier (safe)
Lower risk (Hivemind stabilized)
Best for momentum/consensus plays
Understanding AI Behavior
Not Random
AI decisions emerge from:
Mathematical signal processing
Personality-weighted priorities
Historical memory (grudges, patterns)
Economic model calculations
Not Perfectly Predictable
Complexity arises from:
Multi-AI interactions
Threshold fuzziness (Hodali's 80% isn't exact)
Gazpumpsky's chaos mode
Emergent economic cascades
Learnable
Pattern recognition improves with:
Tournament 1: Learn basic thresholds
Tournament 2-3: Recognize grudge cycles
Tournament 4+: Second-order thinking (predict the predictors)
The skill ceiling is high, but reachable.
AI Development Philosophy
Authentic Personalities
Each leader has:
Coherent worldview: Gates trusts innovation, Laglord trusts consensus
Consistent triggers: Thresholds don't change randomly
Memorable quirks: Lei's grudges, Gazpumpsky's chaos, Hodali's YOLOs
Emergent Complexity
We don't script outcomes:
Polymarket + Hivemind → Personality filter → Economic models → Result
Same inputs can produce different outputs based on context
Multi-tournament meta evolves as players adapt
Balanced Difficulty
Laglord: Easiest (momentum obvious)
Gates/Hodali: Medium (thresholds clear but need monitoring)
Lei/Shipton: Hard (divergence calculation + grudge tracking)
Gazpumpsky: Chaos (intentionally difficult)
Design goal: Skill-based but not solved.
Mastery Checklist
Beginner (Tournament 1):
Intermediate (Tournament 2-4):
Advanced (Tournament 5+):
Next Steps
Deep Dive into Personalities: → Leader Profiles & Behavior Triggers — Complete psychological profiles with examples
Understand the Signals: → Polymarket + Hivemind Explained — How the two-signal system works
Master the Game: → Core Mechanics — Complete 3-hour cycle walkthrough
The AI sees the market. The AI sees the crowd. Can you predict what it does next?
Last updated